NAP Registered Parliamentarian (RP) Practice Exam

When considering what is needed to set aside orders that have been called for by a member, a two-thirds vote in the negative is the correct requirement. This is grounded in the principles of parliamentary procedure which advocate that a strong majority is necessary to overturn or set aside decisions that have already been made.

The rationale behind requiring a two-thirds vote is to ensure that there is significant consensus among the members before altering or negating orders. This serves to maintain stability and order within the governing body; minor or frivolous objections should not have the power to disrupt decisions reached by a majority. Thus, when a member calls for orders to be set aside, it is essential that a substantial number of members agree to do so, hence the requirement of a two-thirds vote in the negative.

Options such as a simple majority, a unanimous vote, or a half-plus-one vote do not fulfill the necessity of ensuring adequate support for such a significant action. These alternatives may allow for less consensus and could lead to frequent disruptions in the proceedings, which parliamentary rules seek to minimize.