What is the status of a proper secondary amendment when the primary amendment to strike out "mahogany" is pending?

A secondary amendment is an amendment that modifies a primary amendment, which, in this case, is to strike out the word "mahogany." When a primary amendment is pending, secondary amendments related to that primary amendment can be considered, but there are specific rules regarding their applicability.

In this scenario, a proper secondary amendment cannot be proposed if it does not logically connect to or further amend the content of the primary amendment currently under consideration. Since the primary amendment to strike "mahogany" is pending, the correct understanding is that no additional amendments can be introduced if they are not applicable to the text being debated (i.e., the removal of "mahogany"). This relates to the idea that secondary amendments must directly impact or pertain to the primary amendment. Hence, the status of a proper secondary amendment when the primary amendment is pending is that it cannot be proposed without being relevant to the context of the primary amendment.

This reinforces the concept that amendments must be relevant and logically connected to the motions being considered, ensuring clear and organized debate.